Mileage In Paid-For Content?
Is paid-for content the only way? Dale Lovell charts the shifts in direction and opposing drivers in the debate over subscription-based content models...
By Dale Lovell
[Register and
post your own comments on this article below...]
That fact that websites have managed to persuade users to stump
up the cash for online content is proof, if any were needed,
that the paid for format can, and does, work online. In fact, it
works very well. Jupiter Research predicts that UK consumers
will be spending £1billion a year on online content by
2006.
Many online publishers are currently faced with a dilemma – to
charge or not to charge. Economics may automatically encourage
publishers to charge, but is that really feasible?
Not only does switching to subscription charging require a
large marketing budget in order to persuade existing users and
encourage new ones to subscribe to the paid-for format, but the
added cost of setting up and then billing, whether using
micro-payments or not, each individual subscriber, can mean that
the initial benefits of charging for content are considerably
diminished.
Pushing online publishers into the paid for content format is
the fear that if they do not begin to charge they will not be
able to compete effectively. But there are ways for sites to
compete without charging for their content.
The fact that online advertising topped £500m in 2004, and the
wide recognition that the medium is now a serious challenger to
radio in terms of ad spend, is positive news for those providing
free content.
If the current trend of charging for content continues,
opportunities will arise for sites providing free content to
compete with their subscription based rivals because sites that
ring-fence their content with subscription charges will
inevitably lose some of their userbase.
Brand jeopardy
While e-commerce has undoubtedly become the top reason for
advertising online, many brands, most recently Heinz to coincide
with the launch of their new soup range, are increasingly using
the internet as a way of increasing brand awareness. Any website
which loses as much as 80% of their visitors virtually overnight
with the introduction of subscription charges will do little to
endear themselves to brand managers hoping to use the internet
as a medium for boosting brand awareness.
Websites which continue to provide free content will have to
step into the gap left by their subscription based rivals and
cater to the needs of advertisers looking to maximise their
brand online.
Websites providing free content must attract those users who
resent paying for content online, of which there will be many,
and then when their user levels are high enough, aggressively
highlight the benefits of the free content medium to
advertisers.
Of course, if the content on a site has about as much appeal as
a dirty weekend away with Jeremy Beadle, no amount of marketing
will make a site competitive.
In the UK we are currently protected from the extremes of paid
for content by the BBC. In so long as the BBC continues to
provide an exceptional online service free from advertising and
subscription charges, on topics as diverse as news, family
history, finance and lifestyle, there is a limit to how
successful a large all encompassing paid-for content operation
can be.
Currently the paid for format only works for a number of well
branded sites that are usually supported by a strong off-line
presence. The Wall Street Journal and the Financial Times are
just two such subscription sites that fall into this mould.
Making the switch without a significant offline ‘carrot’ to
tempt users into subscribing can be extremely difficult.
The ghetto effect
However, with the BBC’s charter up for renewal in 2006 and the
analysis of the Corporation’s activities outside the realm of
public service broadcasting that this brings, the future may not
be as clear cut when it comes to paid for content.
If the BBC is compelled to curb some of its online operations,
as is becoming increasingly likely, and UK consumers continue to
adapt to the subscription format, there is a very real danger of
a ‘ghetto effect’ taking place online as a result of charging
for content, with certain parts of the web becoming no-go areas,
restricted only to fully subscribed members.
What none of us want for the future; publisher, advertiser and
user, is for the web to become an online version of Satellite
television, where everyone with a dish can receive it, but
unless you cough up and subscribe to a monthly package it isn’t
really worth it.
[Register and
post your own comments on this article below...]
About the Author:
Dale Lovell is Content Manager at
www.50connect.co.uk
50Connect is a content-led lifestyle portal for today's over
45s. It was launched in early 1999 and today is the largest
website for the over 45s in the UK.
Comments
You must be logged in to comment.