Industry News | In Practice | The Bigger Picture | Digital Marketing | Your Business | Latest Research

Latest Articles

89% of consumers feel that new EU cookie directive is a positive step

9 out of 10 people feel that the new EU cookie directive is a positive step for consumers, according to the latest eCustomerServiceIndex (eCSI) results from eDigitalResearch and IMRG. By Derek Eccleston.

more

New cookies law lead-in period nearly up: What should businesses be doing?

The 12 month lead-in period for the new cookies law, which means businesses have to gain user permission before accessing personal information, is nearly up. Organisations must carry out their own assessments of how they use cookies and then tailor a solution to that use and their customers. The law demands business to be fully compliant by 26 May. By Kim Walker.

more

Five top tips for successful email marketing in tough climate

A recent study has demonstrated that worldwide the delivery of marketing emails fell sharply in the second half of 2011. With smarter filtering, increased email volumes and deteriorating sender reputations, just how can email marketers successfully vie for attention? New Media Knowledge spoke to Return Path for the answer. By Chris Lee.

more

Related Articles

Parlaying custom into advocacy – why brands should be more pushy with their social media

Filed under: All Articles > Industry News
Tags:
By: NMK Created on: September 30th, 2010
Bookmark this article with: Delicious Digg StumbleUpon

It’s very rare that I get excited about a brand I become a customer of. I’m one of those people who really doesn’t engage with marketing. I’m probably not alone. And yet this is my territory, my metier – I work very hard to create engagement strategies for clients that can be demonstrated to work. I am, as it were, my own worst enemy! By Felix Velarde.

By Felix Velarde

So how do you, as a brand, engage me, as a disengaged person with what I’d consider to be better things to do with my social time than talk about your brand? I’ve been thinking about this in the context of two recent occasions where I have actually felt like praising a brand in public. The first occasion: on the way to a meeting I spilled coffee on my shirt. I was in the city, and I spotted a TM Lewin. I went in, bought a shirt, explained my predicament, and the manager arranged for the shirt to be pressed, in the shop, there and then. I went for a walk for five minutes and hey presto, new, unwrinkled shirt.

I tweeted about it when I got back from my meeting. TM Lewin’s tweetie person followed me and retweeted (quite rightly) my happiness with their service. Fab. The second occasion, this morning, my wife asked me if these were the shoes I normally wear with my suits. I told her they were from Loake, and that I can wak for miles in them – the very first pair of truly comfortable work shoes I’ve had. It crossed my mind to tweet that I love my Loakes, then I remembered I’m not that kind of person (so I wrote this instead).

Both are brands I’d of course love to work with. Both are brands that have built solid reputations for service and product quality. Did Loake sell me these shoes? I think actually I got them from Next, so which of those companies should be the one to do the customer engagement? And why?

One of the striking things about the TM Lewin experience is that very clearly several people from TM Lewin now follow me on Twitter (no idea what they get out of it, but feel free – twitter.com/felixvelarde), but nobody’s ever been in touch. I am clearly, or at least I was once, a brand advocate. I spread the word, in a credible, completely unprompted way. But no-one has since asked me if I’d like to join a loyalty club, or corresponded with me on Twitter or otherwise to find out how to make sure I continue to be an advocate. It’s unpushy, which is nice, but it misses an opportunity. TM Lewin’s social media strategy needs a tweak or two.

And the fact the brand doesn’t have an eCRM programme is quite surprising – all of its customers are repeat customers, we have to buy similar products regularly, we have preferences... TM Lewin could take a leaf out of Pink’s book and keep our sizes on a database, offer us things they already know we want. And so on. The opportunity to create an engaging, relevant and pretty much self-managed eCRM programme should be too good to pass up. And by creating engagement they’ll be parlaying an initial positive first impression into serious loyalty and further opportunities for advocacy.

Someone like me, who doesn’t actively engage, who almost never spontaneously advocates a brand to his friends and acquaintances, might be driven to do so more often. Certainly, I could become a very loyal customer. Since my experience I’ve bought shirts from TM Lewin, though I also buy from Pink, Hackett and others. I could be engaged more, to their exclusion. The next time I think about shoes, I will probably be thinking about buying some Loakes, though because I’m not in their eCRM programme either I have no idea where to start. Perhaps I’ll start with Next. I really can’t remember if it was Next - if not then Loake might lose the sale while I’m wending my (possibly easily distracted) way to their brand – so again, here’s an opportunity.

Brands must – must! – engage with their customers. The best brands, the ones that provide fantastic service, or fantastic products, are the ones that must do so even more – they have an opoprtunity to cement their customers after the first great experience in a way that only becomes more dilute as time goes by. It’s an opportunity that must not be missed.

About the author Felix Velarde is director of Underwired, a leading eCRM agency. Underwired’s clients include News International, Nickelodeon, Laithwaites Wines, The Economist, Peugeot and McCain Foods.

This piece has been published first on Felix Velarde's blog. See the link: http://felixvelarde.blogspot.com/.

Comments

You must be logged in to comment.

Log into NMK

Register

Lost Password?

Newsletter


For the latest news from NMK enter your email address and click subscribe: