<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<article>
  <abstract>Katie Streten argues that even now, digital media&amp;nbsp;is viewed as&amp;nbsp;a poor  relation to other media, but that digital professionals are partly to blame for  this state of affairs. </abstract>
  <allow-comments-and-trackbacks type="boolean">true</allow-comments-and-trackbacks>
  <article-category-id type="integer">2</article-category-id>
  <content>&lt;p&gt;Katie Streten argues that even now, digital media&amp;nbsp;is viewed as&amp;nbsp;a poor  relation to other media, but that digital professionals are partly to blame for  this state of affairs. &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&amp;ldquo;Don&amp;rsquo;t these people have a life?&amp;rdquo; As a digital practitioner, how many times  have you heard those words or something like them? Chances are, if you work with  anyone in television, quite a lot. It expresses a disbelief that anyone would  deeply engage with, well, take your pick of current 2.0 experiences, but Twitter  is often the one that emerges first. This kind of attitude springs out of an  inability to see beyond established media into the media landscape and more  importantly to see beyond their own personal media usage to what other people  might be doing with their time.  &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Of course, it would be doing a disservice to television professionals to say  that they all think this, and it would also be a disservice to suggest that it&amp;rsquo;s  only television execs that do this. Advertising creatives are just as bad.  Though they pay lip service to delivering digital expressions for their clients  and are quick to jump on the latest digital band wagon, in their hearts, the 30  second spot, the billboard, the paid for ad remain the only effective way to  communicate with an audience, no matter what their planners might tell them  about where their audiences actually are. Television equals millions, online  equals thousands. &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;But you know who&amp;rsquo;s also incredibly likely to take a blinkered attitude to  other media? That&amp;rsquo;s right buddy, you and me. Digital professionals.  &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I have actually heard digital professionals say that &amp;ldquo;television is dead&amp;rdquo;. To  confidently assert that the only mediums that matter are digital demonstrates  the same inability to think beyond your own use of media as that of those who  dismiss digital channels. The truth is that other media aren&amp;rsquo;t going to simply  die. The only media that die (smoke signals, stone tablets) do so because an  equivalent has taken their place and they no longer deliver an effective social  function. But there is an ease and effortlessness to television that people  enjoy because fundamentally we all like to kick back, relax and let other people  think for us once in a while. &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;So the likelihood of it completely disappearing is  very low. It will definitely undergo change and I believe its current status as  &amp;ldquo;the first medium&amp;rdquo; will continue to be eroded as online and mobile come into  their own. For instance, we all know that increasing numbers of people watch  television and use the Internet at the same time. It&amp;rsquo;s not that television is  dying it&amp;rsquo;s that it is becoming a parallel medium used in a similar way to radio  &amp;ndash; to accompany other activities.  &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;So why is all this negativity a problem? Blinkered allegiance to one media  moves you from the media landscape to the media ghetto. It&amp;rsquo;s isolationist and  demonstrates a fundamental lack of understanding of future tech development. If  you are planning a campaign or are developing content for a client and you  fundamentally look down on the other media in the media landscape then you will  be doing them a disservice. We need to see our activities as part of a greater  whole and then suggest ways that their effectiveness could be enhanced by using  other media &amp;ndash; not try and dissuade people from using it because in the long run  that will be more effective for our clients and ultimately therefore for us. &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;em&gt;About the author&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Katie Streten is head of&amp;nbsp;insight at &lt;a href="http://www.imagination.com/"&gt;Imagination&lt;/a&gt;. She&amp;nbsp;has been creating online  content and experiences since 1995. Most recently she was the Head of Factual  content online at Channel 4 managing the team that delivers support for all  Channel 4's factual, news and sport output. Prior to that she was the Website  Manager at the Science Museum ensuring that all museums in the National Museum  of Science and Industry had an effective web service and delivered an excellent  standard of content. In 2007 she won a BAFTA with &lt;a href="http://channel4.com/fourdocs"&gt;channel4.com/fourdocs&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;</content>
  <created-at type="datetime">2008-09-12T14:41:00+01:00</created-at>
  <enclosure-mime-type nil="true"></enclosure-mime-type>
  <enclosure-size nil="true"></enclosure-size>
  <enclosure-url nil="true"></enclosure-url>
  <featured type="boolean">false</featured>
  <id type="integer">1011</id>
  
  <is-news type="boolean">true</is-news>
  <permalink>2008/9/12/media-landscape-vs-media-ghetto</permalink>
  <tag-list>media industry</tag-list>
  <title>Media Landscape vs. Media Ghetto</title>
  <updated-at type="datetime">2008-09-12T14:45:24+01:00</updated-at>
  <user-id type="integer">5</user-id>
  <visible type="boolean">true</visible>
</article>
