Latest Articles
The Community Glue
Penny Power, Founder of Ecademy, looks at Community Managers and what they can do to help their Social network survive.
moreMore Everything - The Ofcom 2008 Report
UK consumers are spending more time on communications than ever before but paying less for the privilege, according to UK telecoms watchdog, Ofcom.
moreParents Fear For Networked Kids
Internet experts have called on social network sites to do more to protect children as a survey reveals that three-quarters (72 per cent) of parents spy on their children.
more- Brief Encounter: Richard Mower, PocketSurfer
- Approaching the Crossover
- The Cleverest Thing That Never Existed
- Book Review: Bringing Nothing to the Party
- Marketers Cautious Over Social Media Spend
- Brief encounter: Steve Pammenter, MD, WhiteLabelDating.com
- Business Sites Handicapping SEO
Related Articles
The Cleverest Thing That Never Existed
Semantic search is poorly understood and leading to claims for its powers that lie beyond the bounds of what computers are able to do, says Charlie Hull, MD of Lemur Consulting.
moreBusiness Sites Handicapping SEO
Businesses are alienating a large section of the online market by failing to optimise their sites for disabled Web users. more
Window of Opportunity for Microsoft and Facebook
Microsoft’s continued pursuit of Google has taken a positive step, following the announcement that the Redmond-based company will provide the search tools for Facebook’s 90 million users. more
Google Faces Street View Critics
Google Maps is an ingenious product and much like Google Earth satisfied many curious minds on a lunch break. With Google Street View, however, the reception has not been so positive. The ability to view locations as if we driving through them has come under fire over privacy issues. more
MIcrosoft Buys into Semantic Search
While the definition of Web 2.0 has been argued between digital specialists for some time now, the same key themes prevail. According to Wikipedia, Web 2.0 technology enhances "creativity, information sharing, and, most notably, collaboration among users". The definition of Web 3.0 however is much more difficult to define. more
Related Events
Improving your Business through Effective Search
Location: Central London TBC
Price: £50.00 Reduced to £30.00 if you are eligible for a discount.
Search Engine Marketing (CIM - London)
Location: Cambridge Professional Academy, Suite 201, Albany House, 324-326 Regent Street, London W1B 3BL
Price: Reduced to £99.00 if you are eligible for a discount.
Search Engine Marketing (CIM - Reading)
Location: Black Horse Conference Centre, Reading University, RG6 6AQ.
Price: Reduced to £99.00 if you are eligible for a discount.
New Directions In Search (NMK)
Location: Adam Street, 9 Adam Street, The Strand, London WC2N 6AA
Price: £60.00 Reduced to £40.00 if you are eligible for a discount.
New Directions In Search (NMK)
Location: 01zero-one, Peter Street, Soho, London W1F 0HS.
Price: £60.00 Reduced to £40.00 if you are eligible for a discount.
The PageRank Debate
StumbleUponGoogle has altered its algorithms with a negative affect on the search rankings of many high profile sites. Google has confirmed that it is is downgrading the PageRank (PR) of any sites that seeks to improve its site ranking through mass link purchase. This has caused many rumblings in the blogosphere - with some questioning the worth of PR. Tim Hoang examines the debate.
For the uninitiated, PR is the measurement used by Google to determine the importance (at least in Google’s eyes) of a particular webpage. Developed in 1995 by Larry Page, and later by Sergey Brin, PR provides the basis for all of Google’s web search tools. PR uses the vast link structure of the web as an indicator of an individual webpage’s value, a link from page A to page B is seen as a vote, by page A, for page B. This, combined with Google’s weighting on the importance of each site that votes forms the basis of its search engine and determines the PR of a specific webpage.
With around 3 in 4 searches in the UK being made on Google achieving a high PR can drive traffic to an organisation’s website. The benefits of this are obvious which is why, for many a high PR is viewed as a priority.
Last week a series high profile sites had their PR downgraded by Google after they were found to be embedding ‘paid for’ links on their site. The online portals of The Times, The Washington Post and Forbes were among the sites that were penalised by the popular search engine.
Nihan Jayasinghe, head of search at digital marketing specialists Spannerworks believes that, "in the short term this action may have a negative effect, where clean sites are falling prey to collateral damage. It is impossible for Google to determine with complete accuracy if a site is actually selling links."
Although Google has not accused the sites of taking ‘cash for links’, Matt Cutts, Google’s resident Webspam team leader, pointed out that the recent update was related to selling and buying links.: "The partial update to visible PR that went out a few days ago was primarily regarding PR selling and the forward links of sites. So paid links that pass PR would affect our opinion of a site. Going forward, I expect that Google will be looking at additional sites that appear to be buying or selling PR.
This has particularly concerned bloggers who attempt to build influence through cross-linking and this group has been most vocal about the updates. Many smaller blogs, especially those that heavily rely of text link ads and whose sales depend on strong PR are most affected by this update. There has already been backlash from the blogosphere with various bloggers describing PR as the ‘Joke of the Blogosphere’ and running competitions to see who can ‘create a slogan for Bloggers hit by Page Rank Slam of October 07′.
Aaron Brazell, Technical Director of new media company, b5media and prominent blogger, questioned Google’s right to influence content on his site: "At b5media, we are weighing how we want to respond to this. Either we give in to Google and let them dictate what we do and have the unenviable position of losing PR and possibly advertising dollars, or we take the stand that quality content is quality content regardless of Google and that our content will speak for itself."
However, despite this initial negative response, there are those that view this update to be beneficial to the general public, enabling more accurate searches for search engine users. Robert Scoble, writer of the highly influential tech blog, Scobleizer does not look at his PR and believes that its influence has declined for many years already. Scoble cites how his site had been wrongly given prominence as an expert in offshoring by search engines as a reason for Google’s changes being a positive step. "Back when Google started Page Rank was a pretty global thing. If you had a PR of 6 or 7, it’d apply equally to everything. That’s why, back in 2004, if you did a search for "offshoring" you’d find my blog in #3 position because I had a lot of inbound links so Google just assumed I was relevant for offshoring too."
There are many that would agree with the notion that PR does not have the influence and emphasis placed on it by Google as it once did. Many search engine optimisation (SEO) practitioners realised years ago that PR is no longer indicative of a site’s search engine rankings and have placed less emphasis on attaining high PR. For many, PR is seen as an indicator of how Google rates the overall importance of the site, though not necessarily its position in search results for specific terms.
This is scant consolation for the many sites that rely on high PR to sell advertising and paid for links. These sites will have to rethink their business model in order to cope with Google’s update.
The problem with Google’s automated approach is that it appears to be unreliable and fails to detect intent. Larger organisations should be less concerned about achieving high PR and more concerned with creating accurate and relevant content in order to keep traffic coming to their site. However, until Google formally announces that PR no longer has the influence it once did, organisations will continue to do whatever it takes to achieve a higher PR.
The University of Westminster is a charity and a company limited by guarantee.
Reg. No: 977818 England. Reg. Office: 309 Regent Street, London W1B 2UW
© 2008 New Media Knowledge.
Site created by Green on Black and designed by Imagination
Comments
You must be logged in to comment.