Vox Pop: e-City UK
There's a £10m prize for the best ideas and proposals for digitally-driven schemes that improve and transform the
delivery of public services. What's your reckoning on this government initiative? Check our Vox Pop and add your own views...
By Deirdre Molloy
Talk is rife of late about "e-readiness" in
regards to e-government services, and the debate is widespread
well beyond Britain's digital and political
commentariat.
In the sixth annual survey of e-government in 22 countries
released by management consultancy Accenture earlier this month,
Canada came first, with the UK twelfth in the league table. A
result that could only spur on discussion and action in this
area.
Then there was the EC study of online service provision which
put Britain third amongst its Eurpoean counterparts, below
Sweden and Austria. In 2004, the Economist Intelligence
Unit's annual e-readiness survey put Denmark at number one,
the UK second and Sweden third, with the US trailing at
sixth.
So it's swings and roundabouts in the survey rankings. But
whatever the comparitive merits of tracking e-readiness by means
of these charts, the objectives of e-government are certainly of
primacy to more and more countries. And in the UK on 31 March
the goverment announced a novel initiative to promote innovation
at a local authority level by launching a £10 million prize
competition for the UK's most e-aware city.
The competition - seen as akin to the creative bids that
comprise the jockeying for the City Of Culture mantle - will
encourage local authorities to submit ideas and proposals for
digitally-driven schemes that improve and transform the delivery
of public services.
"Local authorities", reported ZDNet UK, "will
compete in regional 'heats' to win the opportunity to
represent their region in the competition. Each regionally
nominated community will receive £100,000 to develop their bids,
with the winning bid awarded £10m to implement their
idea."
In turn, the Institute For Public Policy and Research is
currently running a 3 week consultation blog at
www.digitalmanifesto.org (7th-13th April:
Innovating; 14th-20th April: Reassuring; 21st-27th April:
Empowering) as a way of gathering opinion, ideas and
recommendations for its forthcoming Digital Manifesto.
All these initiatives seem to hinge on engagement - ie.
consulting, tendering and harvesting ideas - in order to spur
credible innovation and solutions. So in the spirit of dialogue,
we asked
three clued-up folk a consultant,
a policy-researcher and a regional digital network manager for
their say on the objectives of the city of e-Technology prize
and its potential pitfalls and benefits...
What do you think about these initiatives and our sample of
opinion? Register and
post your own comments below...
(1) Can local authorities harness innovation to transform
the delivery of public services?
Of course. The challenge is delivering sustainable innovation
in ways which citizens want to use. Lots of things seem like
good ideas but if they're not well managed and implemented
we end up with a spiders webs of websites, systems and projects
which confuse and don't help citizens. It isn't easy but
there are high payoffs to those who crack the public service
delivery nut.
Jason
Undoubtedly, but so long as they see innovation as primarily
social, not just technological.
Will
I think they could do this in partnership with the private
sector, or more likely, being guided by the key private sector
and University researchers and innovators. But it's not
likely in isolation.
Judith
(2) Is the £10 million prize a good way of spurring them
on?
Yes!
Judith
It might be. I don't know the details of how this will be
implemented. My concern is to make sure that any innovation can
be sustained once these handouts are gone. It will be very
exciting to see some forward-looking councils doing creative
things to take the prize. I hope that what wins is not merely
flashy stuff, but good solid, easy-to-use services.
Jason
Yes, if it shifts the urgency closer to the grassroots.
Will
(3) The government admits that up to now most public bodies
have responded to the communications revolution by simply
putting existing services online rather than using technology to
be truly innovative. Is transforming the DELIVERY of public
services the right next step to take?
Probably, but this is very difficult where a service has been in
existence for decades. It's much easier when the service
being delivered is itself new (e.g. congestion charging).
Will
I don't think we can separate the nature of public bodies
from how they deliver services. To fundamentally alter the way
services are delivered then the supplying bodies and their
processes need to be re-engineered. Technology can either help
that revolution or hinder it. The huge amount of knowledge and
money tied up in existing government IT is a major barrier to
trying really new things.
Jason
Yes, especially where efficiency can be improved. The
introduction of digital delivery methods provides the
opportunity to review internal processes.
Judith
(4) If councils enter ideas to the competition, and the
winning local authority gets to implement the ideas of others as
well as their own, how will the losers benefit?
By borrowing ideas from the winner, and injecting some energy
into their local strategy.
Will
It's hard to say without knowing what sort of ideas come
up. I hope that as much as possible is made available under Open
Source licenses. Councils can be fairly good at sharing their
experiences so I'm sure the winner would work hard to spread
the word, where possible.
Losers will have spent time thinking creatively about their
processes and technologies. I imagine that with or without the
prize money they will be finding neat ideas that improve
services and save money.
Jason
Good question! Not sure. Do they need a shared intellectual
property agreement?
Judith
(5) Does this have anything to do with combating social
exclusion or bridging the e-divide, and if so, is it a promising
approach?
Anything that makes services more accessible to a wider
audience should count in this respect, as long as it makes the
choice of access-method broader, not narrower.
Judith
I don't see it in that light at all, though I know the
government are trying to push that angle. The digital divide is
being and will be bridged by a coalition of organisations from
schools and universities to councils to institutions such as the
BBC. Improving the average wealth of our citizens will also
help. But perhaps we need to get more proactive in exploring
lower-cost forms of Internet access. I'm thinking about
municipal wifi, subsidised low-cost computers and more reform of
the telecoms market.
Jason
I'm not sure that's it's main objective. It's
not necessary to bundle every digital policy agenda together
like that. Just because it's not a digital inclusion policy
as such, doesn't mean it's not worthwhile.
Will
[Register and add
your own views below...]
Related Links:
£10m prize for e-aware city - article, The
Guardian
Accenture e-Democracy Services
Economist
Intelligence Unit
IPPR Digital Manifesto consultation blog
Contributor Links:
Jason Kitcat - Managing
Director, Swing Digital
Will Davies - Senior Research
Fellow in Digital Society, IPPR
Judith Peacock - Business
Development Manager, Codeworks Connect
Comments
You must be logged in to comment.