Latest Articles
Organisations are predicted to spend an increasing share of their marketing budgets on search engine optimisation in 2009. But what are the new themes and issues that will tax organisations in their efforts to make the most of search?
more
Book retailer Borders has become the latest retailer to use social media marketing. New Media Knowledge spoke to industry players about how this sector can gain from a conversational approach.
more
Being able to compete online is a major area which small and medium-sized businesses in particular need advice. New Media Knowledge interviewed sales specialist Sean McPheat for some words of wisdom.
more
Related Articles
Organisations are predicted to spend an increasing share of their marketing budgets on search engine optimisation in 2009. But what are the new themes and issues that will tax organisations in their efforts to make the most of search? more
-
Pay-per-click (PPC) advertising on the Web has been one of the major growth sectors in marketing. Last year, Internet search engine Google overtook ITV for monies received from advertising and nearly $2 billion was spent on PPC globally. New Media Knowledge spoke to a PPC consultant to gauge what companies looking at the technology should consider. more
-
Microsoft’s continued pursuit of Google has taken a positive step, following the announcement that the Redmond-based company will provide the search tools for Facebook’s 90 million users. more
-
Google Maps is an ingenious product and much like Google Earth satisfied many curious minds on a lunch break. With Google Street View, however, the reception has not been so positive. The ability to view locations as if we driving through them has come under fire over privacy issues. more
-
Google has strengthened its position in the online advertising space by finally acquiring DoubleClick for $3.1 billion. Tim Hoang reports. more
-
Track Attack
Applejack's MD Peter Stubbs believes that Google's conversion tracking tools don't work, and that their communication to the user regarding tracking is flawed. Here he outlines why...
This is for anyone who has used Google’s conversion tracking
tools because as far as I am concerned they do not work and
technically there is no way they can work.
The way that Google says it works is:
"If the user clicks on your ad and reaches one of your
conversion pages, the user’s browser sends the cookie to a
Google server, and a small conversion tracking image is
displayed on your site. When such a match is made, Google
records a successful conversion for you."
This is why it can never work:
In the JavaScript code conversion there is no call made to the
cookie and it is not sent back. What is sent back is an http
image call to Google’s server that passes the
"google_conversion_id", the
"google_conversion_value", the
"google_conversion_label", and the date and time.
Therefore as no read of any cookie is made on the conversion
page every hit from that page - whether or not it originated
from clicking on Google's Adword or elsewhere - will return
the image call to Google's server and therefore it is
impossible to track.
What I don't understand is why they do this when to do it
properly (and actually read the cookie) is so simple to do!
What they should actually do (and which again should be very
simple) is every time an Adword is served up this writes a
unique cookie based upon the number of times that Adword has
been called. If this is based upon the keyword it would be
simple to identify every unique visitor who subsequently makes a
sale. Also, the stats won’t be screwed up if the users come from
shared machines.
However what is really disturbing is that if this doesn't
work it throws doubt on the other systems they say they have in
place in particular for tracking click fraud.
I also asked them why I have to show their advert on my site
after a user makes a sale. Their response was that it is because
they want the user to know that they are being tracked. Okay, so
they want the user to know they are being tracked after they
have been tracked. Which is a bit like bolting the stable door
after the horse has bolted. Why the hell should my brand equity
be potentially diminished by Google because of people being
annoyed that they have been informed after the fact, when it is
Google who are the ones supposedly doing the tracking? If they
were really that concerned about letting the user know, they
should have a pop box on their site every time a user clicks on
an Adword informing them that they are about to be tracked and
giving them the option not to be.
You can easily get round this by putting the code on your own
page and changing the image attributes for height and width to 0
or putting it in a hidden DIV layer.
About the author: Peter Stubbs is the MD of
Applejack.co.uk, a full
service online solutions company specialising in bespoke Content
Management Systems, E-Commerce, Search Engine Marketing and
Optimisation as well as professional hosting. Peter is
interested in getting an opinion on whether or not this
contravenes the Trades Description Act. Leave your message for
him below.
Comments
You must be logged in to comment.