Latest Articles
More Web 2.0 Needed In Schools
An influential think-tank calling for more Web 2.0 use in school and technology experts agree, arguing that children should get used to collaborative tools before they enter the workplace.
moreUK Council for Child Internet Safety Launches
The UK Government launched its programme to help protect children from exposure to potentially harmful content on the Internet, including some forms of advertising. New Media Knowledge spoke to AOL, one of the companies involved, to see what real impact the new group would have.
moreUS Presidential Election Gets Social
Last week, Twitter launched its US Presidential Election microblogging site and, with social media likely to play a big part in the outcome, politicians this side of the pond should be looking closely at its impact, experts say.
more- i-design 08 - Brendan Dawes, My Interactive
- i-design 08 - Simon Waterfall
- YouTube gets into Top Gear
- Goldfarming for Fun and Profit
- Sky Appoints its First Head of Mobile Advertising: an Industry Viewpoint
- Industry Welcomes Intel/Yahoo! Internet TV Tie-In
- Media Landscape vs. Media Ghetto
Related Articles
Conversations and Connections
A new paper from Social Tapestries reports on attempts to use internet-based tools to encourage participation and involvement in local issues. While the project has been deemed a failure, the process provided some interesting lessons for policy makers and practitioners. more
UGC and the Law
The era of user-generated content has provided site owners with fresh, inexpensive ways to populate their sites. But it also brings new legal headaches, best avoided rather than remedied. Ian Delaney reports from the presentation given by Paul Massey of K&L Gates at Internet World on 2 May 2007. more
Video Hits and Misses
A new report from Futurescape - From TV Ads to YouTube Anarchy - argues that for marketing through video social networks to succeed, it must "align itself with the members instead of broadcasting at them, TV-style". more
Social Networking and Brands
At yesterday's Blogging4Business conference, Microsoft's EMEA Business Planning and Development Director for Advertising, Michael Steckler, described who uses social networks and why. more
Beers and Innovation 7
So do agencies innovate? The seventh in our Beers and Innovations series addressed an issue that's always been at the heart of the purpose of the events. Ian Delaney attempts to decipher his notes from the session. more
Related Events
Copyright and Rights Exploitation: Film, Television and Digital Platforms (01zero-one)
Location: 01zero-one, Westminster Kingsway College, Soho Centre, Peter Street, London, W1F 0HS
Price: £110.00 Reduced to £100.00 if you are eligible for a discount.
Beers and Innovation 7: Do agencies innovate? (NMK)
Location: Albannach, 66 Trafagar Square, London WC2N 5DS
Price: Reduced to £15.00 if you are eligible for a discount.
Beers & Innovation (NMK)
Location: The Bell & Compass (downstairs bar), 9-11 Villiers St, London WC2N 6NA.
Price: Reduced to £10.00 if you are eligible for a discount.
PR and P2P - The Perfect Anti Piracy Pitch
Location: Guardian Newsroom
Price: £45.00 Reduced to £25.00 if you are eligible for a discount.
Assumptions and Constraints
StumbleUponNo-one knows the future with perfect certainty but Project Managers can make use of assumptions in risk management. Dr David Hillson examines assumption analysis...
No-one knows the future with perfect certainty, which of course is why we need risk management. But sometimes we try to guess what might happen, and use that information as a basis for planning or decision-making. The proper name for such a guess is an “assumption”, and these are an important source of risk, for projects, businesses and life in general.An assumption is a way of dealing with an uncertain future when there are a number of possible options. In its simplest form an assumption is a decision to proceed on the basis that one option will turn out to be correct and the others will not happen. For example, we might assume that our suppliers will deliver on time, or that our client will sign-off all approvals within two weeks, or that all key members of our project team will remain for the duration of the project. But what happens if we assumed the wrong thing? In most cases a false assumption would lead to a problem for the project, since we usually tend to assume that things will go the way we want.
Of course not all assumptions matter equally. There are some assumptions which might prove false without having a significant effect on the overall project, but there are others where a different outcome could be serious. Fortunately there is a simple process for testing how risky assumptions might be, and for including them in the risk process if necessary. A simple IF-THEN statement can be written for each assumption, in the form :
“IF this assumption proved to be false, THEN the effect on the project would be …”
The IF side tests how likely the assumption is to be unsafe, and the THEN side tests whether it matters. Another way of describing this is to see the IF statement as reflecting probability, whereas the THEN phrase is about impact. And probability and impact are the two dimensions of risk. This simple approach can be used to turn project assumptions into risks. Where an assumption is assessed as likely to be false and/or it could have a significant effect on one or more project objectives, that assumption should be considered as a candidate risk.
This type of Assumptions Analysis is a powerful way of exposing project-specific risks, since it addresses the particular assumptions made about a given project. There are however two dangers with this technique:
- 1. The first weakness is that this technique can only consider explicit assumptions, which have been consciously made and openly communicated. There are however many implicit or hidden assumptions which we all make every day, some of which are very risky.
- 2. Secondly this approach tends only to identify downside risks, threats that a particular assumption may prove false and result in a problem for the project. Assumptions Analysis is not good at identifying opportunities because most of our assumptions are optimistic.
For opportunity identification, the technique can be extended to address and challenge constraints. These are restrictions on what the project can or cannot do, how it must or must not proceed. But some of these constraints may not be as fixed as they first appear – indeed some of them might be assumed constraints. In fact it might be possible for a constraint to be relaxed or perhaps even removed completely. In the same way that assumptions can be tested to expose threats, a similar IF-THEN test can be applied to constraints to identify possible opportunities:
“IF this constraint could be relaxed or removed, THEN the effect on the project would be …”
Instead of making assumptions about the future, or accepting that stated constraints are unchangeable, being prepared to challenge assumptions and constraints can expose significant threats and opportunities which can then be addressed through the risk process.
About the author: Dr David Hillson PMP FAPM FIRM MCMI is an international risk management consultant, and Director of Risk Doctor & Partners (www.risk-doctor.com). He is a popular conference speaker and award-winning author on risk. He is recognised internationally as a leading thinker and practitioner in the risk field, and has made several innovative contributions to improving risk management. His recent emphasis has been the inclusion of proactive opportunity management within the risk process, which is the topic of his latest book.
The University of Westminster is a charity and a company limited by guarantee.
Reg. No: 977818 England. Reg. Office: 309 Regent Street, London W1B 2UW
© 2008 New Media Knowledge.
Site created by Green on Black and designed by Imagination
Comments
You must be logged in to comment.