Industry News | In Practice | The Bigger Picture | Digital Marketing | Your Business | Latest Research

Latest Articles

ebuzzing launches blog advertising service in the UK

The UK launch of ebuzzing signals a new channel for brands and advertisers to reach highly targeted audiences via social media. It also monetises bloggers so that they receive (fully disclosed) payment for writing about the campaigns that interest them. By Steve Green.

more

Skillset and Abertay to present conference about excellence in games education

Skillset has collaborated with Abertay University to organise ProtoTeach a conference about “best practice in games education” being presented at Dare ProtoPlay in Edinburgh next month. By Nick Sheridan.

more

Search for property rentals drop by half a million as punters look to buy instead

The latest quarterly analysis of online search data by leading independent search and social marketing consulting and technology firm Greenlight, reveals that unlike February, there were more online searches made by UK consumers in May for places to buy as opposed to rent. The report, ‘Real Estate Sector Report May 2010‘, also reveals that when it came to sales by location, Scotland proved the most sought after region. Edinburgh was most popular followed by Glasgow then Aberdeen. Cumulatively, they accounted for 19% of all location-specific sales keyword searches.

more

Related Articles

Web Accessibility Myths

Filed under: All Articles > In Practice
By: trenton Created on: June 10th, 2004
Bookmark this article with: Delicious Digg StumbleUpon

The DRC's recent report has suddenly thrown web accessibility into the spotlight of the online community and a lot of misinformation has been thrown around. In this article Trenton attempts to put a stop to this and tell you the truth behind web accessibility.

The Disability Discrimination Act says that web sites must be made accessible to disabled people. The DRC's recent report has suddenly thrown this into the spotlight of the online community and a lot of misinformation has been thrown around. This article attempts to put a stop to this and tell you the truth behind web accessibility.

1. Creating a text-only equivalent is sufficient

Creating a separate text-only equivalent can lead to a number of problems:

  • A text-only version is not necessarily accessible
  • Two versions of the same website represents a huge time and money investment for you
  • Your primary site may still be inaccessible to many users
  • An ‘extra’ website for blind and disabled users can be one more way to make them feel marginalised from mainstream society

Web accessibility isn't just about blind and disabled Internet users being able to use your site - it's about everyone being able to access it successfully. It really doesn't have to take very much time or money to make your website accessible.

2. It's complicated and expensive to make my website accessible

To develop an accessible website from scratch will cost virtually the same as to develop an inaccessible website. A very large, highly inaccessible website may take a bit more time and money to fix up, although the basic layout and design usually need not change.

Web accessibility is not complicated and anyone with basic web design skills can easily implement it.

3. Accessible and attractive web design can't go together

Many advocates of web accessibility tend to have rather dull, unattractive websites. This is unfortunate, as web accessibility need not affect the design of the website in any way whatsoever. To fully dispel this myth, have a look at the CSS Zen Garden - a beautiful website offering 100% accessibility.

4. Accessible websites stifle creativity

Web accessibility actually places very few restrictions on website design. In fact, as with regular websites, you're only really limited by your imagination when creating accessible websites. Have a look at the CSS Zen Garden to see for yourself that creativity doesn't have to be affected in any way.

5. My site visitors don't have a problem accessing my website

Not necessarily. See Benefits of an accessible website - part 1 to see just how many Internet users you may be excluding from your site. You can be sure that with 35 million websites to choose from it's unlikely that a site visitor prevented from accessing your website is going to waste his time contacting you to ask you to fix the problem.

6. Web accessibility places restrictions on the web page design

Not at all. As with regular websites, you're only limited by your imagination when creating accessible websites. Text size can be as large or as small you like (provided it's resizable), you can use any colour scheme you like (provided colour isn't the only way you differentiate information) and you can use as many images as you like (provided an alternative description is provided).

These provisos mostly happen behind the scenes and don't affect the presentation of the website.

7. Blind and disabled people don't use the Internet

On the contrary, blind and disabled people benefit from the Internet perhaps more than anyone else.

For example, visually impaired people have to phone up a supermarket when they want to go shopping to inform them of their arrival. When they get there, a store assistant will accompany them around the store. Through accessible websites blind people can now shop at home, and in their own time.

Conclusion

Web accessibility isn't brain science. It's not just about disabled users being able to access your website - it's about everyone being able to access your website, including people using handheld devices, WebTV and in-car browsers. Any web developer with basic HTML and CSS design knowledge, and a bit of time on their hands, can easily learn and implement web accessibility.

This article was written by Trenton Moss. He's crazy about web accessibility and usability - so crazy that he went and started his own web accessibility and usability consultancy to help make the Internet a better place for everyone.

Comments

ronnie said:

What are the statistics? <p>Blind, partially sighted and disabled people do use websites - but how many? Does anyone know of any studies or statistics? <br/> <br/>I've always thought it would be a good idea to have a few extra domain suffixes for web users with particular needs. Rather than go to www.nmk.co.uk, for example, a blind person would go to www.nmk.xyz, which would be optimised for screen readers and so on. If all sites used this convention, it would potentially improve the user experience for all web users, as it would allow a degree of specialisation that the current 'one size fits all' ethos can't achieve.<br/></p>

nathan_barley said:

Crazy Constable (PC gone mad) <p>Far too much emphasis is put on this accessibility stuff. It's ridiculous. Quite like your dedicated domain idea, Ronnie. To draw some parallels - it's not as if book publishers have to bring out books that can be read by sighted people and blind people at the same time: they bring out separate editions in braille. And TV programmes don't all have someone signing for the deaf - only some of them do.<br/></p>

umesh said:

Get Some Background <p>Instead of trying to write everything here, just hop over to http://www.inclusivedesign.org.uk/ and have a read. <br/></p>

wyldman said:

Design Is King <p>Sorry, which one of those Zen Garden sites isn't the rather dull and unattractive one. The web should be driven by design, innovation and business first and foremost if it is to progress, not some bunch of jumped up rule makers.<br/></p>

You must be logged in to comment.

Log into NMK

Register

Lost Password?

Newsletter


For the latest news from NMK enter your email address and click subscribe: