Industry News   In Practice   The Bigger Picture   Digital Marketing   Your Business  

Latest Articles

The Community Glue

Penny Power, Founder of Ecademy, looks at Community Managers and what they can do to help their Social network survive.

more

More Everything - The Ofcom 2008 Report

UK consumers are spending more time on communications than ever before but paying less for the privilege, according to UK telecoms watchdog, Ofcom.

more

Parents Fear For Networked Kids

Internet experts have called on social network sites to do more to protect children as a survey reveals that three-quarters (72 per cent) of parents spy on their children.

more

Related Articles

Related Events

In it to Win It

Filed under: all articles
Tags:
By: NMK Created on: June 10th, 2004
Bookmark this article with: Delicious Digg StumbleUpon

As people nationwide visit the polling booths today, Mike Nutley of NMA considers the effect of mass participation with interactive media, and the transformation of politics because of it.

A fly-poster campaign broke recently for a new series on MTV following the fortunes of a number of unsigned bands chasing a record deal. The show is being promoted very much as the anti-Pop Idol; indeed one of the executions uses the line "This isn't pop, and we're not idols". But it was another execution that really started me thinking. This read "The public won't decide who wins". At first I thought that what bothered me about it was that it runs contrary to the spirit of rock, which since the 60s has sought to promote its rebelliousness and its lack of respect for the establishment, even as the business side of the music business has become ever more slick.

But as I thought more about it, I realised that what was actually bothering me was a much more modern concern; that in these days of mass participation and mass interaction, the campaign feels hopelessly dated. People, particularly young people, have adopted interactive media with enthusiasm - 70m iTunes downloads in a year tell us that, as do the surveys into young people's attitudes to SMS marketing campaigns. It's often trotted out that more young people vote in Big Brother than do in elections, and that this is clearly a bad thing. Indeed it is, but what it also tells us is that young people will take part in a process when they feel involved in it and that they can influence the outcome.


This same idea cropped up last week at a meeting of the Comic Relief New Media Advisory Group. A couple of members of the group stressed that all the evidence, anecdotal and from research, indicates that young people are more interested in political issues than they have been for many years. The reasons they tend not to act on that interest are that they don't know if anyone else feels the same way, and they don't know what action to take. And, as became apparent during the subsequent discussion, political systems are not set up to allow them to engage in the way that Pop Idol or Big Brother are.


What's also interesting is that the first two of these problems are ones that interactive media are very good at addressing. Chat rooms and message boards allow you to communicate with other like-minded people, while Web sites and mobile phones can offer and co-ordinate courses of action. Last summer's craze for Flash Mobs (mobile phone-based gatherings of people to perpetrate "art pranks") demonstrated just how effective these tools could be, and Howard Dean's US presidential campaign brought them into the political arena.

So what, in fact, we're seeing is the beginning of the same transformation in politics as is happening in most other areas of human interaction. Businesses and organisations are being forced to rethink and reorganize themselves as control of their communications increasingly passes to their customers, audiences and stakeholders. Politicians are going to have to accept this changing relationship just as marketers, doctors and lawyers are, or their constituency is simply going to leave them behind.

Mike Nutley is the editor of New Media Age.



Comments

colin_kirkpatrick said:

Flash Mobs missed the point <p>I agree that interactive communications technologies are potentially very exciting in terms of providing a means to mobilise and politicise the public in new ways. Howard Dean's campaign, the anti-war protestors and anti-globalisation movement, even the dreaded petrol protestors and countryside alliance, have all used websites, email news groups, mobile phones etc. to organise themselves. The people behind Flash Mobs, on the other hand, were very clear about the fact that they weren't trying to say anything at all, which is why I find the idea so infuriating. It's faintly depressing that 300 people can be persuaded to turn up in a random furniture shop to take part in a prank, but well under 50% of the electorate can be persuaded to vote in the recent elections. Blogging has demonstrated that at least some web users are still passionate about politics and current affairs -- the challenge is to to use these tools to get more young people involved.<br/></p>

You must be logged in to comment.

Log into NMK

 Register
Lost Password?
Login

Newsletter

For the latest news from NMK enter your email address and click subscribe:


Subscribe

NMK on the Web