Organisations are predicted to spend an increasing share of their marketing budgets on search engine optimisation in 2009. But what are the new themes and issues that will tax organisations in their efforts to make the most of search?
moreBook retailer Borders has become the latest retailer to use social media marketing. New Media Knowledge spoke to industry players about how this sector can gain from a conversational approach.
moreBeing able to compete online is a major area which small and medium-sized businesses in particular need advice. New Media Knowledge interviewed sales specialist Sean McPheat for some words of wisdom.
moreAn online survey has revealed that the relationship between the PR industry and the journalist community is more strained than many had thought. Tim Hoang - part of the team that carried out the survey - reports. more
The relationship between the world of journalism and public relations was turned on its head after Chris Anderson of Wired magazine blacklisted public relations officers who had sent him press releases which were not relevant. Tim Hoang reports on the fall out and the response from both sides. more
Fantastic. Prince gave away his new CD for ‘free’ with a national newspaper, former Kinks frontman, Ray Davies, is soon to follow and Radiohead recently invited you, Joe Public, to decide precisely how much (or not), to pay for the digital release of their latest oeuvre, In Rainbows… more
Ted Rheingold, the founder of the Dogster and Catster social sites for pet owners, advised delegates at the Future of Web Apps on the teething pains that attend turning a simple gimmick or tool on the web into a full-time job. more
The first keynote of the conference, Jason Calacanis, proclaimed that there is an environmental crisis on the Internet, and that SEO is responsible for it. more
Netimperative's Philip Buxton argues that ISPs need to step up their efforts to stop spam.
By Philip Buxton, editor of Netimperative (www.netimperative.com), 25 April 2003.
If spam critical mass were a definable quantity, I think it would be fair to describe it as less than one genuine email in 30, which is the current condition of my inbox.
In the last couple of weeks, we have featured a number of columns and pieces of research on the subject and while this is due in part to our inherent dislike for the stuff - genuine opt-in email senders are greatly at risk from the threat of spam - it is also due to the amount of information we are now receiving on the topic.
Soon we'll be revealing details of just what we plan to do about it - for now, discussing the subject seems a fair starting point. The answers to simple questions, such as 'does the out-of-office assistant provide our email address to spam senders?' seem beyond most of us and it's clear that there are some simple steps we ourselves can take to address the disgraces that are our morning inbox. A quick tip-list provided by a respondent to Niki Panourgias's rather controversial column on Monday is posted at the bottom of this comment for your perusal.
But, as AOL is now in the process of trying to prove, there is much, much more that can be done. So far, users have put up with spam as a price worth paying for the practical joy of email. However, there is a significant groundswell of people now convinced that the price has risen too high. In practical terms, this means that companies will, if not invest in anti-spam technology, then at least learn and deploy the tools already at their disposal. It also means potential legal steps to prevent spam will be taken more readily, and that the government, ISPs, industry bodies, and anybody with any relation to the process of spam will be under ever greater scrutiny.
We have never really dealt with the intrusion of direct marketing mail-drops in the offline world and it's hard to define just what makes the online version even more frustrating (their lack of verbal flair is my principal beef), but infuriating it most certainly is and we are without question at a point of action.
For the moment, AOL deserves the best of luck, ISPs need to step up their efforts and companies need to see what can be done to further protect our own inboxes. I for one would delight in no longer being led to believe that there is money in the penis enlargement business.
Paul at ASP developer Cactusoft writes:
1. Remove email addresses from your web sites and replace them with a contact form instead. For safety, send autoresponders to anyone emailing these addresses informing them the account is no longer checked and that they should use the web form.
2. Use major blocklists - many small companies don't bother because they don't realize that MailDaemon software supports these DNS-based systems and that using them is free. We use spamhaus, spamcop and spews, among others. While it is possible to block innocent mail, a clear bounce message can be set up and direct people to a web site form instead.
3. Filter email based on headers - MailDaemon and other such packages allow filtering of mail based on specific headers. ISP can tag mails with X-warning tags if the originating IP address is on one of the lists they're checking. Filter on this and delete such mail.
Philip Buxton began his career in journalism as a reporter for licensed trade newspaper the Licensee & Morning Advertiser, having completed a degree in marketing at Lancaster University's business school. He then joined national business weekly Marketing Week as a reporter, taking responsibility for the magazine's new media news coverage three months later. He joined netimperative (www.netimperative.com) in April 2000 as a reporter on its media & marketing channel and was appointed editor in April 2002.
Comments
You must be logged in to comment.