Organisations are predicted to spend an increasing share of their marketing budgets on search engine optimisation in 2009. But what are the new themes and issues that will tax organisations in their efforts to make the most of search?
moreBook retailer Borders has become the latest retailer to use social media marketing. New Media Knowledge spoke to industry players about how this sector can gain from a conversational approach.
moreBeing able to compete online is a major area which small and medium-sized businesses in particular need advice. New Media Knowledge interviewed sales specialist Sean McPheat for some words of wisdom.
moreAn online survey has revealed that the relationship between the PR industry and the journalist community is more strained than many had thought. Tim Hoang - part of the team that carried out the survey - reports. more
The relationship between the world of journalism and public relations was turned on its head after Chris Anderson of Wired magazine blacklisted public relations officers who had sent him press releases which were not relevant. Tim Hoang reports on the fall out and the response from both sides. more
The first keynote of the conference, Jason Calacanis, proclaimed that there is an environmental crisis on the Internet, and that SEO is responsible for it. more
The new law governing unsolicited email marketing came into effect on December 11, 2003. What are the consequences for your business? more
The all party internet group has jumped on the spam bandwagon - but how will they define 'spam'? By Phillip Buxton. more
Using third-party email lists for your marketing campaign can be counter-productive and even illegal, argues Darren Fell, MD of Purepromoter.
With the whole world crying out against the constant barrage of spam besieging their inboxes, is our industry doing all that it can to prevent spam, or actually making matters worse?
Stunning as it may seem, I am still coming across adverts to sell lists. “7 Million Email addresses for rental” the advert screams.
What they the customers purchasing these lists fail to realise is that the original granted to use the email addresses has long been abused by a continuous stream of untargeted, irrelevant emails, as the lists are used again and again by different companies and brands.
As the godfather of permission marketing himself, Seth Godin, states in his book on the subject, "It's clear to me that the most important part of the permission troika - anticipated, personal and relevant - is anticipated. And Spam is not just unanticipated, it's dreadful."
On a daily basis I am asked ‘do you sell lists?’. Like a CD player on repeat I have to deliver the same speech, talking of the benefits of building lists organically through clever online partnerships, competitions and text back-facilities, rather than risking damage to your brand by using rented lists.
List brokers do have a place in the market but the brands must be clear as to their intended goals. If the numbers game is the immediate priority, with the emphasis on building up customer databases using brokered lists, BEWARE!
A major UK animal charity unfortunately made a couple of gaffs recently by sending a mass mailout to bemused residents in Virgina, USA. Two weeks later, Texans received pleas to protect British kittens during Guy Fawkes' night! Relevant, focused, targeted? I’m afraid not.
Good businesses are based on credibility, and that has usually been built up over many years. It can take one Spam too many to lose it. Going down what appears to be the easy route isn’t quite so easy when it attracts negative publicity. The simple answer is just don’t do it!
As each industry body advocates the anti-Spam route, the Advertising Standards Authority finally took a stance last month, advocating that companies obtain explicit consent before sending email and SMS. This is good news!
With the EU Data Directive now in place in the UK as well as most of Europe, it will be illegal to send an email or SMS without the express permission or the recipient.
So although we cannot directly stop spamming companies from hiding behind false email addresses and relaying mass mailouts via far-afield countries like North Korea, let’s see if the industry, the email marketing companies, the agencies and the brands themselves can take a long, hard-look at how to stamp out spam in the digital media industries. It’s really not that hard to be ethical.
Darren Fell, Managing Director of Purepromoter (www.purepromoter.com)
Darren, along with his team have built one of the first ethical electronic messaging companies and adopts a system called Requested Customer Relationships (RCR) which automatically ensures the brands do not inadvertently continue to Spam their target audience. This is how the company got the name ‘Pure’, says Darren.
Email Darren at: darren.fell@purepromoter.net
RCR is a system that for the first time puts the recipient in control of their Inbox by allowing them to select as much or as little further communication from that company. If they are distrusting of the opt-out link, RCR will automatically opt them out after a few more mails and one warning mail. This ensures brands are protected and only those who continue to find this information relevant and useful, continue to receive it. RCR is currently undergoing the Patent process.
Comments
fullinbox said:
Purepromoter spams too <p>Funny how spammers always define spam as something other than what they do. <br/> <br/>I got spam from some recruiter wheeze from these guys. Was not wanted or relevant. Did they care? <br/> <br/>They maintain their right to fire as much email at you until either your email system collapses, or you beg for mercy. When you report it as spam, they get all whingy and say they are saving the planet because they are cutting down on direct mail. Hell! I don't want direct mail either. But I don't want their spam. They aren't saving trees - they are spamming me. Simple. <br/> <br/>They say they got the name "pure" through some ethical consideration. Well, its "pure spam" to me... its bulk mail, I didn't request it, I didn't give permission to receive it, and I'm not interested in it. If you wish to promote your product by spam, remember it will be viewed alongside other products which are similarly promoted in this way - penis pills, pornography, fake drugs, etc.<br/></p>
darren.fell@pure360.com said:
Pure in NOT a spammer <p>Dear 'fullinbox', <br/> <br/>I am very sorry that you feel that one of Pure's customers has sent you a piece of unsolicited communication. <br/> <br/>As a member of the DMA we follow the strictest of guidelines, far beyond the EU data directive and beyond the DMA guidelines. As you can see, we treat this very seriously as this has been passed to me, the Founder of Pure360.com. <br/> <br/>In this case we will investigate this in detail as we literally jump on any issue that arises! <br/> <br/>To help us with this investigation can I ask that you send me (my details are available on NMK) the offending email and your email address or the recruitment company you remember it being from. <br/> <br/>We will immediately ask them for proof that they have collected your information correctly and check the actual deliveries to you. This will include an IP address, the username you signed up to their service with etc. If we are not entirely happy that they have acted responsibly and cannot produce this proof, we will immediately cancel their service from Pure. <br/> <br/>I look forward to hearing back from you so in your eyes we can clear our good name. <br/> <br/>Pure is unlike the rest of the marketplace in the email marketing industry. I can promise you we really do care as hopefully you can see by my efforts. <br/> <br/>Kind regards, <br/> <br/>Darren Fell.<br/></p>
You must be logged in to comment.